A UMass research on video gaming attitudes and behaviors is said to be the largest in US history.
Gambling is definitely an topic that is important Massachusetts at the moment, as the state prepares for the coming of at least two large resort casinos within the next few years.
The University of Massachusetts at Amherst (UMass Amherst) has released a study that gives a baseline for the state of gambling in the state now, one that can then be used to track changes in long term studies in advance of that gaming expansion.
The study, which comes through the School of Public Health and Health Sciences at UMass Amherst, surveyed almost 10,000 Massachusetts residents.
That is enough to produce it the largest gambling study ever completed in the United States.
The study ended up being praised by Massachusetts Gaming Commission Chairman Steve Crosby, who stated so it should provide an objective way to understand how the state has been impacted by gambling going forward.
‘The most important point is that we are establishing standard conditions for every socio and economic variable that would be impacted by the introduction of casinos,’ Crosby said. ‘Our scientists will then track alterations in those variables throughout the entire life of the gambling enterprises in purchase to know up to a certainty the effects also to inform mitigation that is data-driven for almost any potential negative consequences.’
The survey was conducted between September 2013 and May 2014, with state residents being selected at random to complete the questionnaire.
The outcome was a wide range of information detailing precisely how people in Massachusetts gamble and view various forms of gaming.
For example, it turns out that about 72 percent of respondents reported gambling at least one time within the year that is past.
Most Massachusetts residents (about 60 %) said they played the lottery, while 22 percent reported that they’d gone to a casino during the previous 12 months.
One topic that is hot the location happens to be how Massachusetts’ brand new casinos will impact current casino operations in Connecticut. The study suggests that officials in Connecticut are straight to worry: 65 percent of those Massachusetts residents who went to casinos visited resorts in Connecticut, a portion which should go way down once the Wynn Everett and MGM Springfield are operational.
The study also looked at exactly how residents experience the state’s gambling expansion, which includes a slots parlor or over to three casinos that are full-scale. The clear answer was one that was heard in many communities through the entire state: not in my own backyard.
A strong 59 % majority of adults in Massachusetts said they think gambling expansion will either have a impact that is neutral be useful to the state.
But, 46 percent believe that gambling expansion would be harmful inside their own community, while just 28 % trust casino expansion would be beneficial locally.
The research also discovered that illegal gambling ended up being fairly typical in Massachusetts. About 13 percent of residents had bet on sports within the year that is past while two percent reporting gambling on unregulated Internet gaming web sites.
More in-depth analysis regarding the data gathered is anticipated to be released in the months to come. However, major detective Rachel Volberg claims that the real value in this survey ended up being gathering information before viewpoints could be shaped by the introduction of casinos.
‘Not many people realize just how unusual it is for a problem gambling study to be completed before some brand new type of gambling becomes available,’ Volberg stated. ‘The Commonwealth is fortunate that both the Expanded Gaming Act and the Massachusetts Gaming Commission therefore clearly and forcefully supported such an effort and I am excited to share our findings before any casinos begin operations in our state.’
FIFA President Sepp Blatter (right) then Secretary General of Interpol, Ronald Noble, seal the deal. Interpol has now figured FIFA does not share the fundamental values associated with statutory law enforcement community.’ No shit! (Image: cnn.com)
Interpol has frozen a €20 ($22.5 million) donation, compensated to it by FIFA, to finance a joint program that is anti-match-fixing.
The 10-year Integrity in Sport initiative was built to stamp out fixed games orchestrated by criminal gambling syndicates, but Interpol said this week that the FIFA corruption scandal had made the relationship untenable.
‘In light of the context that is current FIFA, while Interpol continues to be committed to developing our Integrity in Sport program, I have decided to suspend the agreement,’ said Interpol Secretary General Jürgen Stock. ‘ All outside partners, whether public or private, must share the fundamental values and axioms of the organization, also as those of the wider law enforcement community.’
The terms and conditions regarding the deal, signed last year, state that that FIFA must remain ‘compatible utilizing the concepts, aims and activities of Interpol,’ but, after the arrest of seven FIFA officials as the outcome of a massive FBI corruption probe, Interpol may be forgiven for feeling that the soccer governing body has not held up its end planet 7 oz bonus codes of the bargain.
It begs the question, though, why ended up being Interpol, along with its access that is wide-reaching to expansive network of police agencies, uninformed of FIFA corruption last year?
The press that is british crying foul as far right back as 2006. This was the year that journalist Andrew Jennings published Foul! The World that is secret of: Bribes, Vote-Rigging and Ticket Scandals. The title says it all.
Additionally in 2006, Panorama, a BBC current affairs program, broadcast a documentary asserting that Sepp Blatter was being investigated by Swiss police for attempting to wallpaper over a FIFA bribery scandal.
The former chairman of the English Football Association, described FIFA as an organization that ‘behaves like a mafia family’ in it, Lord Triesman,
A follow-up Panorama documentary in 2010 accused Issa Hayatou, Vice President of FIFA, of taking bribes. He threatened to sue the BBC, but he did not.
Interpol’s willingness to bury its mind in the sand might have been more concerning the fact that the €20 million FIFA paid to the international police agency constituted more than one fourth of its annual budget.
Finally, though, with FIFA exposed and indicted by the united states, the only country that dared to support the organization to task, it had been too much, or to embarrassing, for Interpol to stomach.
The FIFA communications director Walter De Gregorio cracked a ‘joke’ about his employers on Swiss TV this week, and believe us, it’s a zinger on a lighter note!
‘ The FIFA president, secretary general and communications director are all traveling in a car,’ grinned De Gregorio.
‘But who is driving?’ he quizzed.
‘The police,’ he zinged.
Briefly afterwards FIFA announced that De Gregorio had plumped for to ‘relinquish his office.’
Safa Abdulla Al Geabury, whose £2 million check that is dud when Ritz staff attempted to cash it the day after their gambling spree. (Image: standard.co.uk)
The Ritz Club, London’s famously high-end, high-roller casino, is suing A swiss home tycoon over a £2 million ($3.1 million) bounced check.
In accordance with the Ritz’s filing, Safa Abdulla Al Geabury composed out the check to finance a gambling session one night in February last 12 months, but it turned out to be a dud whenever casino tried to bank it the morning that is following.
The Ritz normally seeking a supplementary £200,000 ($310,000) in accumulated interest on the debt.
This has been reported that the casino, which can be owned by reclusive billionaire twins that are identical Sir David and Sir Frederick Barclay, has been plunged into the red by way of a variety of unpaid gambling debts, forcing it to pursue its debtors aggressively into the courts.
Based on the London night Standard, the casino has litigated against 10 high rollers in the year that is last in an effort to recoup 2013 losses of £12.5 million ($19.4 million).
Al Geabury’s protection is which he is a gambling addict and his staff needs to have understood this and stopped him from playing.
He desires the debts written off, but he’s on shaky ground with this line; in 2014 the casino won an identical tall Court battle against Noora Al-Daher, the spouse of this Omani minister that is foreign.
The Ritz sued Al-Daher after she had checked out the casino in April 2012 and proceeded to lose £2 million ($3.3 million) in a hours that are few. Al-Daher failed to honor £1 million ($1.65) of her debt. She quickly counter-sued the casino, claiming that the casino had taken advantage of her.
Al-Daher had claimed in court that Ritz Club employees encouraged her to continue playing a game title of chemin-de-fer, despite having been made alert to her gambling addiction, and also allowed her to cash checks, which she claimed was illegal.
She also said that the casino have been under a ‘duty of care’ towards her, a responsibility which it had neglected to fulfill.
However, the court heard that Al-Daher and her family had apparently happily gambled away $5 million in Las Vegas a months that are few her visit towards the Ritz.
In ruling in favor of the casino, the judge said he was certain that, had Al-Daher been refused authorization to hold in gambling at the Ritz, she ‘would happen eager and likely to gamble at other casinos thereafter, and really probably during her stay in London during the days or weeks after 3 April 2012.’
The judge within the Al Geabury case, Mrs Justice Simler, meanwhile, said at a hearing that is preliminary psychiatric reports have now been commissioned to evaluate Al Geabury’s state of mind in the day he lost the money and whether he had been accountable for their actions.
‘The essence is whether Mr Al Geabury features a gambling addiction therefore the claimant’s familiarity with that,’ she said.